Sarmale si mici

Via Alex Barnett am aflat despre un excelent articol din luna martie din Wired ce descrie fenomenul economiei FREE.

In articol se prezinta mai multe modele de gratuitate - o taxonomie a culturii FREE. Mi-e lene sa traduc asa incat:

• “Freemium”
  What’s free: Web software and services, some content. Free to whom: users of the basic version.
• Cross-subsidies
  What’s free: any product that entices you to pay for something else. Free to whom: everyone willing to pay eventually, one way or another.
• Zero marginal cost
  What’s free: things that can be distributed without an appreciable cost to anyone. Free to whom: everyone.
• Labor exchange
  What’s free: Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.
• Gift economy
  What’s free: the whole enchilada, be it open source software or user-generated content. Free to whom: everyone.

Tot Alex barnett povesteste despre o discutie legata de asta in emisiunea lui Charlie Rose

(Nota: Charlie Rose este gazda unui talk show ce trateaza in general probleme serioase din societate si care e produs si distribuit de PBS, reteaua americana de televiziuni publice. Televiziunea publica in america e ruda saraca a retelelor comerciale. De asta probabil ca auzim foarte rar de Thirteen sau WGBH Boston, iar majoritatea programelor sunt produse - in parteneriat cu - de BBC)

The interview also moves to the topic of the Yahoo! and Microsoft merger. Rose asks: “Why is it that Yahoo! can’t recruit the people at Google - through some extraordinary salary offers - that would let Yahoo! replicate what Google has?”

Anderson’s answer (paraphrased): “There is a basic philosophical difference between Google and Yahoo! Google is a Machine company. Google believes that data, machines and the Algorithms will drive the company’s growth. Yahoo! is a people company - it believes content created by people and the conections made between them with its drive growth.”

“And what about Microsoft?“, Rose asks. Anderson responds (again, paraphrasing) - “Microsoft is a pre-web software company that philosophically wants to be somewhere in between Google and Yahoo!” An oversimplified analysis, surely (hey, it’s a TV interview answer), but I think the Anderson’s conclusion is pretty accurate at its heart.

In cazul unui subiect mare, agregatorii de stiri aduna foarte multe referinte. Subiectul esecului negocierilor dintre Microsoft si yahoo a adunat in prima zi peste 2000 pe Google News.

• O lista a acestora e publicata aici 

Am tacut o vreme, si asta nu neaparat pentru ca am intrat ca si Romania in vacanta de 1 Mai. Am petrecut sarbatorile de Pasti la Oxford si a fost foarte frumos. Vremea a fost foarte buna, asa incat am lancezit pe paturi in parcuri si am mobilizat gratarul cu carnati cu usturoi verde, coaste olimpice, aripi aviare, si alte de astea.

Sebastian s-a simtit excelent, a alergat toate zilele si a jucat golf in curte la Catalin. Dupa ce ne-am intors acasa, au reinceput ploile.

Alte chestiuni relativ interesante de pe aici:

• Am vazut un prim episod dintr-o serie de documentare BBC/Open University intitulate “Immigrant Life”. Daca ar fi fost facute in Ro probabil ar fi insemnat un lung sir de metafore, incurajari, laudarosenii, etc. Asa a fost foarte interesant, mai ales ca unul dintre subiecti era un roman sofer de taxi in Plymouth
• Alta serie de documentare pe BBC e acum “Chinese School”. Imagini familiare cu olimpiade, Daciada chineza, cravate, defilare si alegeri de comandat de grupa si de detasament.
• In alt domeniu, de pe E-media Tidbits am aflat cum e cu interactivitatea in ziarele europene: